Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

1940: The fall of France Hardcover – 1967

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"

Product details

  • Hardcover: 228 pages
  • Publisher: Cassell; First British Edition edition (1967)
  • ASIN: B0000CNQ4P
  • Product Dimensions: 21.3 x 14.2 x 3 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 4,929,365 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Excalibur on 30 Dec. 2010
Format: Hardcover
André Beaufre was an eminent French general and strategist, who witnessed the fall of France to the Germans in 1940. Despite the title of this book, of the 215 pages of text, only the last 36 pages are about the Battle of France. This book is more of an autobiography, covering different chapters in Beafure's career, beginning with his service in the French Army in Morocco against the 'Riffs' in the 1920s.

As a soldier, he witnessed the decline of the French Army in the interwar period. Beafure notes that the Army became too focused on the strategy and the tactics of defensive warfare. The Germans, on the other hand, had learnt the lesson of their defeat at the Marne in 1914 by developing a theory of 'lightning war' that would achieve victory quickly to prevent the Allies fulfilling their full potential. The French Army's defensive attitude was at odds with Marshal Foch's Little Entente with the states of Eastern Europe because the basis of those alliances was that France would come to their aid; that is, they would attack Germany. The ruling philosophy of the French Army and its obligations were at total odds.

Even when it came to the defence of France, the preparations were slow and inadequate. The Maginot Line along France's eastern border was commissioned in 1928 but was not completed until ten years later, and even then its planned extension to Belgium did not see the light of day. In 1924 the French decided to adopt the light machine gun; it was brought into service between 1926 and 1932 but the design for the rifle that could use the same ammunition was not chosen until 1936. Even by 1939 only a few thousand existed, despite the Army consisting of millions.

In their air force too, rearmament was inadequate.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Look for similar items by category