8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Review, 11 Oct 2003
This review is from: 1745: A Military History of the Last Jacobite Rising (Paperback)
There have been many histories of the 1745 Jacobite Rebellion and many more continue to be published. The question is, why should the reader bother with this one?
Well, it provides a wholly new perspective on the rising. Though the writer claims that he is not biassed, this is not the case, and this is not necessarily a bad thing. This book sees the rising as much from the viewpoint of the British Army (which the author once served in) as it does with the Jacobite rebels. Most histories are vice versa.
The Dyke of Cumberland and General Hawley, often and uncritically labelled 'The Butcher' and 'Hangman' are given a fairer assessment. Likewise, Lord George Murray, often praised as the genius of the rebel army, and O'Sullivan, another leading rebel, are reappraised. Far from being a genius, Murray is portrayed as a military novice who often made tactical errors. Sullivan comes off rather better - an experienced soldier, not a buffoon.
Reid is good on military details; many authors are not. Thus he rightly points out that cannonfire against the rebels at Culloden was not hugely effective until the rebels reached close quarters. He also squashes the myth that the defenders of London were an ill trained rabble of amateurs.
Of course, the book is not perfect. Concentrating wholly on military factors, we do not see any of the crucial political, religious and economic factors which were also of importance.
This is a long overdue revisionist treatment of the rebellion and should act as an antidote to the majority of pro-Jacobite histories in this field.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Middle-ground?, 5 Aug 2007
Interesting title for a rare balanced view - to use the pro-Jacobite rising rather than the pro-Hanovarian rebellion. Reid always has much to contribute, and if this one prompts dispute so much the better. Some same-old same-old myths are punctured but the real problem is how to cut through the legend-creation of years of one-sided press. Reid comes close, making good account of previously under-used archive material, as always, and provides an excellent study of the differences between the two armies. But, like many, and with my partisan hands up, I must be reluctant to achieve balance here, call me an old romantic, but maybe we need to fall over the other way for a while before we can really see the middle-ground. This is a strong and worthwhile addition to the ongoing debate.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
1745: militery history, 22 Dec 2011
This review is from: 1745: A Military History of the Last Jacobite Rising (Paperback)
An interesting and unusual book. Written by a dedicated Scottish Nationalist, yet highly critical of elements of the Jacobite army actions. Questions Lord George Murray's total adherence to the cause. Tries to include a balanced view from the Hanoverian side. Revommended for this alone, as well as some lesser facts eg the MacCleod chief avoided prosecution in 1740 by becoming a government suppoerter. He would have been convicted of selling some 100 of his clansmen into slavery abroad!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No